Introduction
Decision modelers are frequently criticized for failing to provide accurate representations of
the neuro-psychological substrates of decisions. Several authors maintain that recent neuropsychological findings enable choice modelers to overcome this alleged shortcoming. Some
advocate a realistic interpretation of neuro-psychological models of choice, according to which
these models posit sub-personal entities with specific neuro-psychological counterparts and
characterize those entities accurately. Neural - Management / Neuropsychology and Neural
Sciences are an interdisciplinary field that seeks to explain human decision making, ability to
process multiple alternatives and follow a course of action. In the last decade, the development
of neuroscience knowledge and tools allowed a growing interest in research linking neuroscience techniques to psychology, marketing, management, economics, and sociology. It studies
how managerial behaviour can shape considerate of the mind and how neuro-scientific findings can constrain and guide models of neural management. Converging into a unified discipline, neural studies investigate the neuro - aspects of management decisions. The inter disciplinary field of scholarship draws on Management theories, Economic theories, Psychological
theories, Statistics theories, Mathematical theories, Operational Research theories, Computing
theories, Experimental Economic theories, Neuroscience theories, Hematology theories, Ophthalmology theories, Dermatology theories and Physiology theories to develop a comprehensive with the ultimate aim of creating a (single) general theories understanding of human decisions. Neuromanagement provides Biologists, Economists, Psychologists and Social Scientists with a deeper understanding of how they make their own decisions and how others decide. Neuroscience, when allied with Psychology and Economics, creates powerful new models to explain why we make decisions.